Posted by Tom Moertel
Thu, 31 May 2007 04:01:00 GMT
Earlier today I received an email from the editor of a
Pennsylvania-based magazine. (I won’t mention the name of the magazine
in case what I’m about to write next amounts to a spoiler.) He asked
if I would allow the magazine to publish one of my photographs of
British soldier
lichen
in an upcoming issue.
Of course, I said yes. (I’m always looking for ways to spread the word
about British soldier lichen.)
My fee? I asked for a free issue of the magazine when it goes to
press. They said it will be in my mailbox.
Cool.
Posted in photography
Tags fun, lichen, me, photography
no comments
no trackbacks
Posted by Tom Moertel
Fri, 25 May 2007 21:42:00 GMT
The Kenwood audio-video receiver that forms the core of my
home theater system stopped responding to its remote control. As I
discovered shortly thereafter, having to leave the couch to fiddle
with knobs degrades the “home theater experience.” Clearly, something
had to be done.
I knew the receiver was the culprit because the remote control worked fine
with other components of my system. I figured the IR sensor had gone
bad and did a little Googling for “Kenwood” and “IR sensor” and
“problem”. The results revealed that
many other Kenwood customers had the same
problem.
The cause of the problem, I learned, was that the solder joints which
connect the IR sensor’s leads to the display board eventually fail
because of thermal expansion. That explanation seemed to account for
what I was observing, so I cracked the case in search
of visual confirmation.
First, I found the joints where the IR sensor was connected to the
circuit board. The vertical red line shows where I found them:
Then I examined the joints closely. Sure enough, at least one had completely failed:
The problem confirmed, I moved to the solution phase of the project.
With my soldering iron, I touched-up the joints:
It wasn’t my best work, but it did the job.
Now my receiver is back on speaking terms with its remote control,
and I have returned to the modern world. Life is good
Posted in hardware
Tags hardware, ir, kenwood, receiver, repairs, soldering
4 comments
no trackbacks
Posted by Tom Moertel
Fri, 18 May 2007 05:21:00 GMT
A strange thing happened to me over the weekend. While traveling, I
stopped at a Sheetz gas station / convenience store in Meadville,
Pennsylvania. This store, I noticed, was serving espresso. Curious,
I ordered a double, my usual test-out-the-new-place order.
When I received my double, I was prepared for the worst. I had
learned the hard way that few coffee houses in the United States can
make a decent espresso. And this Sheetz was not a coffee house.
My grim expectation was only reinforced by what I had in my hand – a
paper coffee cup, feeling ominously heavy. Based on the weight, I
knew the espresso was going to be over-extracted – watery and
probably sour, too.
After I paid and left the store with my Big Cup Of Espresso, I paused
in the sunlight for a closer look. Something wasn’t right. The cup
was one-third full, but the crema actually looked pretty good, unlike
what I would have associated with insanely over-extracted espresso.
When I took a taste, I was surprised again: the espresso was pretty
good. While not what I would call a great shot, it was perfectly
drinkable and better than what I expect from Starbucks.
It was then that I realized that something unusual was going on at
Sheetz. If the espresso I was drinking didn’t look over-extracted, and
if it didn’t taste over-extracted, and yet it did fill one third of a
12-oz. coffee cup, it couldn’t have been a double. It must have been
a quad.
My curiosity piqued, I decided to call Sheetz and ask what was really
in my cup. I ended up talking with John, their coffee specialist, and
he (besides being a nice guy) confirmed that, at Sheetz, a single
serving of espresso is about 2 ounces in volume and is made from 14
grams of coffee. My double serving, then, was made from two 14-gram
pulls, for 28 grams of coffee in total. So I had, indeed, been
drinking what at most coffee houses would have been four shots.
Mystery solved.
Based on my conversation with John, I expect that espresso at Sheetz
is likely to be fairly consistent. I hope, then, that the sample I
tried at the Meadville store is a good predictor of what I can get at
other Sheetz locations. If so, I may have found a solution to the
problem of finding decent espresso when on the road.
Have you tried straight espresso at Sheetz? If so, what did you think?
Update 2007-05-22: On Saturday, 19 May, I tried another sampling
of Sheetz’s espresso, this time at the Grove City, Pennsylvania store.
I ordered a “single” serving, equivalent to a double at most coffee
houses. The preparer, to my disappointment, pulled the shot into a
12-oz. coffee cup and then, to my dismay, poured the shot from the
12-oz. cup into a 2-oz. cup, leaving much of the crema behind
and resulting in a drink that looked damaged. The taste was damaged,
too – slightly watery with a mild sour note.
Thus my second trial of Sheetz’s espresso was disappointing. I can
only hope that my preparer’s two-cup technique was her own, unique
variation on the standard practice at Sheetz. In any case, if you
order a single at Sheetz, play it safe: ask that your shot be pulled
directly into a 2-oz. cup.
Posted in espresso
Tags coffee, espresso, sheetz
6 comments
no trackbacks
readers
