<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Tom Moertel's Weblog: Category math</title>
    <link>http://blog.moertel.com/articles/category/math</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Quality rants on programming theory and stuff geeks like</description>
    <item>
      <title>Baker's percentages and how not to explain them</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I like to bake, and I work in a professional kitchen from time to time,
so I picked up &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471405256/ref=nosim/tommoertesweb-20"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Baker&amp;#8217;s Manual&lt;/em&gt;, 5th
ed.&lt;/a&gt;, hoping to carry it in my kitchen bag as a quick reference for
large-scale recipes.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Before going further, you need to know two things about professional
bakers.  First, they measure dry ingredients not by volume, the way
home bakers do, but by weight, which is both faster and more precise
for the large quantities frequently used in professional kitchens.
Second, when the pros write bread recipes, they express quantities in
relative terms called &amp;#8220;baker&amp;#8217;s percentages.&amp;#8221;  Each ingredient&amp;#8217;s
quantity is given as a percentage of the recipe&amp;#8217;s total flour weight.
For example, the book provides the following recipe, referred to as a
&amp;#8220;formula,&amp;#8221; in the section on baker&amp;#8217;s percentages:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;80.0%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;bread flour&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;20.0%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;whole wheat flour&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;66.0%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;water&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;2.0%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;salt&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;1.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;yeast&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;As you would expect, the percentages for bread flour and whole wheat
flour add to 100 percent.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Now, here&amp;#8217;s where the book goes down in flames.  It attempts to
explain how baker&amp;#8217;s percentages let you easily scale recipes
to any desired batch size, but it fails.  Utterly.  Here&amp;#8217;s
the book&amp;#8217;s explanation for how to scale the above recipe to 300
pounds:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;[T]o calculate the weight of each ingredient in the [300-pound]
recipe, you add up all of the percentages in the above formula.  This
total percentage value is 169.2. Divide this number by the desired
dough weight, 300 pounds, to get .564.  Round this number up to get
.6.  Then &lt;em&gt;multiply&lt;/em&gt; the percentage amount for each ingredient in the
above recipe by .6 to obtain the larger weight required by the larger
recipe.  (Emphasis mine.)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;When I read that explanation, I thought, &lt;em&gt;Multiply? That&amp;#8217;s the
&lt;strong&gt;exact opposite&lt;/strong&gt; of what you ought to do.&lt;/em&gt; And, sure enough, the
book went on to prove its own explanation completely wrong:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;80% bread flour * .6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 48 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;20% whole wheat flour * .6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 12 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;66% water * .6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 39.6 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2% salt * .6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 1.2 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.2% yeast * .6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= .7 pound&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: the above is quoted verbatim from the book.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Does the &amp;#8220;scaled-up&amp;#8221; recipe yield 300 pounds? Nope.  Add up the resulting
weights and you get 101.5 pounds.  Oops.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Is it really that hard to see that the correct method is simply to
multiply each percentage by desired batch size and then divide by the
sum of percentages?  In the case of the book&amp;#8217;s 300-pound example, we
would multiply each percentage in the recipe by the following factor:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p style="text-align: center"&gt;300 pounds / 169 percent = 177.5 pounds&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#8217;s try it out:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;80% bread flour * 177.5 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 142 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;20% whole wheat flour * 177.5 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 35.5 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;66% water * 177.5 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 117.2 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2% salt * 177.5 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 3.55 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.2% yeast * 177.5 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;= 2.13 pounds&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Now if you add up the resulting weights, you get the desired
total of 300 pounds.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;That the book not only gets the scaling method completely backward but
then goes on to &lt;em&gt;prove itself wrong&lt;/em&gt; is amazing.  Didn&amp;#8217;t anybody at
John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons proofread the math?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Not exactly a confidence-builder for the rest of the book.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2946948a-369f-4357-a4ac-7e8226b175f4</guid>
      <author>Tom Moertel</author>
      <link>http://blog.moertel.com/articles/2006/09/16/bakers-percentages-and-how-not-to-explain-them</link>
      <category>reviews</category>
      <category>books</category>
      <category>math</category>
      <category>baking</category>
      <category>math</category>
      <category>oops</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.moertel.com/articles/trackback/177</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Math makes tea taste better</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I enjoy tea, especially green varieties, which taste best when infused
at less-than-boiling temperatures. The problem is that my electric
water kettle can reach only one temperature reliably: a full-boiling
212 degF. To infuse my tea, then, I have devised a simple, reliable
way of heating water to other temperatures.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I start by boiling three cups of water in the kettle. (I know that I
need at least that much to warm my cup and infuse my tea.) Then I cool
the boiling water to the desired temperature by adding just the right
amount of tap water.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The trick, of course, is determining the right amount of tap water to
add. In my house the tap water is about 80 degF. Thus to infuse at a
green-tea-friendly 180 degF, I must solve the following equation:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;div style="text-align: center; margin: 1ex;"&gt;
3 cups · 212 degF + &lt;em&gt;x&lt;/em&gt; cups · 80 degF
= (3 + &lt;em&gt;x&lt;/em&gt;) cups · 180 degF
&lt;/div&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Solving, I get &lt;em&gt;x&lt;/em&gt; = 0.96, and so I draw just shy of a cup from the tap.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;This boil-and-cool method is easy and effective. And it costs less
than buying a temperature-adjustable water kettle, which would
probably be inaccurate anyway.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Just one more example of how math makes life better.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:3d4c32b7386334cc45eea9a0975a73ee</guid>
      <author>Tom Moertel</author>
      <link>http://blog.moertel.com/articles/2005/07/11/math-makes-tea-taste-better</link>
      <category>fun stuff</category>
      <category>math</category>
      <category>food</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.moertel.com/articles/trackback/56</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
